Testing and validating the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire
The sampling domain of the trait EI framework comprises 15 distinct components, which have been derived by Petrides and Furnham (2001) via content analysis of salient models of EI including those of Bar-On (1997), Goleman (1995), and Salovey and Mayer (1990) and cognate constructs such as alexithymia, affective communication, emotional expression, and empathy. Using a subsample of 150 participants, the associations between the TEIQue and a series of relevant constructs (Big Five, life satisfaction, somatic complaints) were examined, which also included data on other trait EI measures. early self-report EI measures (most of which were developed without a clear theoretical framework, overlooking core facets of the construct’s sampling domain or purporting to measure EI as a cognitive ability; for a critical overview see Pérez, Petrides, & Furnham, 2005), Petrides and colleagues (Petrides, 2001; Petrides & Furnham, 2003) embarked on the development of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue), predicated on their trait EI framework and theory.
Table 1 presents a brief description of these components, which provide comprehensive coverage of personality facets relating to affect (cf. In view of the conceptual shortcomings of * Corresponding author. Overall, the TEIQue showed theoretically expected relationships to all other constructs and incremental validity in the prediction of life satisfaction and somatic complaints over and above the Big Five as well as all other trait EI measures combined. The TEIQue consists of 153 items (rated on a seven-point Likert scale) and 13 facets, organised under four-factors: well-being, selfcontrol, emotionality, and sociability (see Table 1).
It is simply a conviction, a belief of blind faith that a selection test is valid.
There is no empirical evidence and, what is more, none is wanted.
Content Validity (also known as logical validity) refers to the extent to which a measure represents all facets of the construct (e.g. For example, a depression scale may lack content validity if it only assesses the affective dimension of depression but fails to take into account the behavioural dimension.
When constructing any test or questionnaire, the items should be representative of the domain to be measured.
In a personality questionnaire, the question of face validity often relates to the questions asked.
For example, the question “Does your soul ever drift away from your body?
For example, a spelling test containing only the names of professional footballers would be of poor content validity as a general purpose of spelling.
Empirical Validity (or predictive validity) is the relationship between test scores and some criterion of performance obtained, e.g. One type of validation study involves people currently employed.
Testing and validating the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue) in a German-speaking sample H. Petrides and Furnham (2001) in order to reduce misconceptions and to organize the burgeoning EI literature, have emphasized a clear distinction between trait EI (or ‘‘trait emotional self-efficacy”) and ability EI (or ‘‘cognitive-emotional ability”).
Scherl b , Heiner Rindermann a a Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2/III, A-8010 Graz, Austria b Nottingham University Business School, UK article info Article history: Received 18 February 2008 Received in revised form 14 July 2008 Accepted 22 July 2008 Available online 28 August 2008 Keywords: Trait emotional self-efficacy Personality Life satisfaction Somatic complaints TEIQue . Introduction abstract Over the past 15 years, emotional intelligence (EI) has received considerable attention within scientific research.
Two additional facets (adaptability, self-motivation) contribute directly to the global trait EI score (for detailed psychometric analyses of the TEIQue see Mikolajczak, Luminet, Leroy, & Roy, 2007; Petrides, in press).Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating